Mediation can be
a cost effective means of dispute resolution even though the mediator, unlike
an arbitrator in a binding arbitration, typically does not have the authority
to make a final determination concerning the issues presented. Nonetheless, if
the parties are sufficiently motivated towards resolution, the mediator can
help close the deal.
The primary
purpose of mediation is to obtain a resolution of the dispute. But even if
unsuccessful, the mediation can serve to further crystallize the respective
positions of the parties, provide the perspective of an independent opinion
from someone who has no skin in the game and even be a basis for a creative
approach towards resolution.
In a recent
matter handled by my office, I was able to successfully mediate a One Million
Dollar ($1,000,000.00) settlement in a breach of contract action. The most
significant factor in its resolution was clearly that the parties were
motivated. Despite the motivation, however, there existed significant obstacles
to a settlement because of the defendant's tenuous financial position.
The mediation,
however, was helpful in overcoming these obstacles as the mediator, in a
tempered even handed way, provided a dose of reality for both sides.
In addition, by
comprising a settlement that consisted of cash, stock options and additional
contractual work, the parties through discussion creatively addressed the
defendant's concerns over its ability to pay.
And in the final
analysis, I am sure it did not hurt that our adversary was well aware that in
the event mediation was not successful, our office was fully competent and
capable of addressing these issues at trial, if necessary.
Please feel free
to reach out for all your legal needs.
Sincerely,
Mario Biaggi Jr.